Usury Bites—A Refresher on an Easily Overlooked Issue in the Restructuring and Private Equity Arenas

Print This Post Print This Post

For millennia usury (defined as any interest on a loan, not just interest above some prescribed rate) was condemned as immoral in almost every culture (and in some it still is). Even such great thinkers as Aristotle disapproved of the charging of interest, describing it as the “most unnatural” means of “getting wealth” because it “makes a gain out of money itself, and not from the natural object of it.”1 In the United States, of course, compensating a lender for making a loan seems a completely natural and expected part of finance; and usury is a term that typically now only refers to the charging of interest in excess of that permitted by applicable law. But usury, however defined and regardless of the rate at which the concept kicks in, remains a subject of state specific opprobrium. Indeed, those states that proscribe usurious rates of interest typically declare the charging of usurious interest as being contrary to a fundamental public policy of the applicable state. And the penalties for violating these proscriptions can be severe, including in certain circumstances the forfeiture of the principal advanced.
Continue reading >>

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC

It’s been an interesting couple of weeks for bankruptcy at the United States Supreme Court with two bankruptcy-related decisions released in back-to-back weeks. Last week, the Supreme Court issued an important decision delineating the scope of section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code (discussed here [1] for those who missed it). Then […]

London Restructuring Bulletin: What will 2018 hold?

Weil’s London Business Finance and Restructuring team is excited to bring you our “What will 2018 hold?” bulletin, an overview of the legal and market outlook for the restructuring and insolvency market this year. You can view our other recent articles on European Restructuring Watch, a site dedicated to presenting […]

Second Circuit Allows Efficient Market Interest Rates For Cramdown Loans

The United States Second Circuit has issued its ruling in the Momentive Performance Materials cases resolving three separate appeals by different groups of creditors of Judge Bricetti’s judgment in the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, which affirmed Judge Drain’s confirmation of Momentive’s plan of reorganization. […]

The Cloak of Good Faith: Protecting Bankruptcy Sales from Appellate Review

Prashant Rai recently published an article on appellate review of section 363 sales in the April 2017 edition of the Norton Bankruptcy Law Adviser.  To access it, please click the link below: https://www.weil.com/~/media/files/pdfs/2017/nbla_april_2017.pdf Posted with permission from Norton Bankruptcy Law Adviser, April 2017 issue.  Copyright (c) 2017 Thomson Reuters/West.  For […]

No Contradiction in Contribution: Tenth Circuit Finds that Bankruptcy Court Approval of Settlement of CERCLA Environmental Claims Does Not Estop Subsequent CERCLA Contribution Claim

Overview In Asarco, LLC v. Noranda Mining, Inc., the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held that representations made to the bankruptcy court that the Debtor’s settlement of environmental claims reflected only the Debtor’s share of the cleanup costs did not judicially estop the Debtor from brining a contribution claim against another […]