Last week, the Second Circuit heard oral arguments in the widely followed Marblegate Asset Management LLC v. Education Management Corp. case. When the appeal is resolved, it is expected to provide a useful guidepost for financially distressed companies that wish to engage in consensual, out-of-court restructurings of their bond debt. At issue is whether Section 316(b) of the Trust Indenture Act provides an independent cause of action for noteholders where there has been no breach of any indenture covenant but the practical effect of a restructuring transaction supported by the majority of the noteholders is to insure that the holdout noteholders will not recover principal or interest.
In this alert, we report on the parties’ arguments to the Second Circuit and the questions which the panel appeared to be focused on.
Copyright © 2019 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, All Rights Reserved. The contents of this website may contain attorney advertising under the laws of various states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is headquartered in New York and has office locations in Beijing, Boston, Dallas, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Miami, Munich, New York, Paris, Princeton, Shanghai, Silicon Valley, Warsaw, and Washington, D.C.